Discussion
Holoprosencephaly is a rare central nervous system malformation resulting from absent or incomplete cleavage of the forebrain (prosencephalon) into the two cerebral hemispheres and lateral ventricles.
Etiology and classification
Depending on the degree and the stage at which morphologic development is inhibited, DeMayer categorized holoprosencephaly into alobar, semilobar, and lobar types5.
·        Alobar holoprosencephaly is the most severe lesion, in which no cleavage of the prosencephalon has occurred. Instead of a ventricular system with distinct lateral and third ventricles, a monoventricle cavity is present. The thalamus and corpus striatum are fused in the midline, while the midbrain, brainstem, and cerebellum may be structurally normal. Facial abnormalities associated with this type include cleft lip and palate, cyclopia, and chromosomal aberrations, usually trisomy 13, are common in the group.
·        Semilobar holoprosencephaly results from less severe cleavage abnormalities of the prosencephalon. Although a frontal monoventricle is present, posterior partial formation of occipital lobes occurs.
·        In the mildest form, lobar holoprosencephaly, the two hemispheres and lateral ventricles are better separated, the hemispheres may be fused, and the lateral ventricles widely intercommunicated due to absence of the septum pellucidum.
The prognosis of affected infants depends on the severity of holoprosencephaly. Alobar holoprosencephaly is uniformly lethal, while the prognosis of lobar is variable. Infants with the lobar type may have mild, moderate or severe mental retardation. Semilobar holoprosencephaly has an intermediate but generally quite poor, prognosis6,7.
Associated abnormalities
Aneuploidies
Several chromosomal abnormalities are associated with alobar holoprosencephaly, with the most frequent being trisomy 13; others are trisomy 18 and partial monosomies of 13q and 18q.
Facial anomalies
Severe facial anomalies are typical of alobar holoprosencephaly. The presence of hypotelorism, cyclopia, arhinia with proboscis and median cleft lip/palate help in reaching the diagnosis by ultrasound8. In our case, the appearance of hypotelorism supported the specific diagnosis of alobar holoprosencephaly, and trisomy 13 was found on karyotype analysis.
Diagnosis
Due to the poor prognosis, a specific in utero diagnosis of holoprosencephaly is important. Until 1984, the earliest gestational age at the time of diagnosis was 27 weeks9-10. In utero diagnosis during the early second trimester was then reported11. Bronsthein12 reported the diagnosis at 14 weeks, and Birnholz13 at 12 weeks. Nelson and King4 reported first trimester diagnosis of this anomaly but with vague intracranial findings. In the present case, using a high-frequency transvaginal probe (7.5 MHz), identification of earlier fused thalami and a large monoventricular cavity at 10.5 weeks was possible. In addition, absence of midline echo and third ventricle was noted. Although pathologic confirmation of the sonographic features was not possible, the detailed sonographic images were typical of alobar holoprosencephaly14,15.
Embryologically, holoprosencephaly develops as early as 5-6 weeks of gestation. Therefore, it was not surprising that a high-resolution transvaginal transducer enabled an early in utero diagnosis. In a previous study, we showed that at the beginning of the tenth week the telencephalon, which consists of two lateral outpockets representing the cerebral hemispheres, is clearly identified due to the echogenic choroid plexus which fills the cavities of the lateral ventricles almost completely1. Caudally, the hypoechoic thalamus, which is the dominant portion of the developing diencephalon, can also be observed at this gestational age. Failure to identify this classical pattern, together with the appearance of facial abnormality, provided an accurate specific prenatal diagnosis so early in pregnancy.
Differential diagnosis
In the differential diagnosis of a fetus with a large intracranial frontal cyst at such a stage of gestation, other abnormalities should be considered. It would be difficult to differentiate alobar holoprosencephaly from hydranencephaly, since absence of the midline echo is found in both conditions. However, midline structures such as falx cerebri, interhemispheric fissure and third ventricle are present in hydranencephaly and absent in alobar holoprosencephaly. In our case, hydranencephaly could be excluded by demonstration of displaced cerebral cortex and hypotelorism that are typical of alobar holoprosencephaly.
Prognosis
From a practical perspective, the prognosis for both hydranencephaly and alobar holoprosencephaly is very poor; therefore, early termination of pregnancy may be requested by the family. Obviously, the main advantage of a first-trimester transvaginal diagnosis of severe brain abnormality is that it allows parents to elect rapid karyotype study and terminate the pregnancy. If termination of pregnancy is requested following the diagnosis, it can be carried out by dilatation and evacuation, which to many pregnant women is a more acceptable procedure and entails lower risk of complications to the mother than does termination later in the second trimester.
References
1. Achiron R, Achiron A. Transvaginal ultrasonic assessment of the early fetal brain. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1991;1:336-44.
2. Kennedy KA, Flick KJ, Thurmond AS. First trimester diagnosis of exencephaly. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:461-3.
3. Achiron R, Malinger G, Tadmor O, Diamant Y, Zakut H. Exencephaly and anencephaly: A distinct anomaly or an embryologic precursor. In utero study by transvaginal sonography. Israel J Obstet Gynecol 1990;1:60-3.
4. Nelson LH, King M. Early diagnosis of holoprosencephaly. J Ultrasound Med 1992;11:57-59.
5. DeMyer W. Holoprosencephaly. In Vinken PJ, Bruyn GW (eds.) Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1977, Vol 30, pp 431-78.
6. Manelfe C, Sevely A. Neuroradiological study of holoprosencephalies. J Neuroradiol 1982;9:15-45.
7. Gorlin RJ, Cohen MM, Levin LS. Syndromes of the Head and Neck, Third Edition. The holoprosencephalic disorders, . New York: Oxford University Press, 1990, pp 573-582.
8. Hunke M. Clinical cytogenetic and molecular approaches to the genetic heterogeneity of holoprosencephaly. Am J Med Genet 1989;34:237-45.
9. Chervenak FA, Isaacson G, Mahoney MJ, Tortora M, Mesologites T, Hobbins JC. The obstetric significance of holoprosencephaly. Obstet Gynecol 1984;63:115-21.
10. Toth Z, Csecsei K, Szeifert G, Torok O, Papp Z. Early prenatal diagnosis of cyclopia associated with holoprosencephaly. JCU 1986;14:550-53.
11. Nyberg DA, Mack LA, Bronstein A, Hirsch J, Pagon RA. Holoprosencephaly: prenatal sonographic diagnosis of fetal anomalies. AJR 1987;149:1051-58.
12. Bronstein M, Weiner Z. Early sonographic diagnosis of alobar holoprosencephaly. Prenat Diagn 1991;11:459-62.
13. Birnholz JC. Smaller parts scanning of the fetus. Radiol Clin North Am 1992;30:977-991.
14. Filly RA, Chinn DH, Callen PW. Alobar holoprosencephaly: ultrasonographic prenatal diagnosis. Radiology 1984;151:455-59.
15. Pilu G, Romero R, Rizzo N, Jeanty P, Bovicelli L, Hobbins JC. Criteria for prenatal diagnosis of holoprosencephaly. Am J Perinatol 1987;4:41-9.