Results
The gestational age ranged from 14 - 40 weeks. The relationship between fetal foot length and gestational age is shown in figure 3 and table. A significant linear relationship between those parameters (R2= 0.89, p<<0.0001) was present.
Discussion
Ultrasound has been an indispensable tool in assessing gestational age. Estimation of fetal age using multiple parameters has been described by others14.
In 1987, Munsick18 found no significant racial difference in the foot, leg, or arm measurements between nine and 20 weeks of gestation. Advances in ultrasound technology have made possible accurate measurement of fetal boots and assessment of fetal extremities. In 1987, Mercer et al4 described the ultrasonographic measurement of the fetal foot to estimate gestational age. They concluded that fetal foot length was a reliable parameter for estimating gestational age and was particularly useful when other parameters did not accurately predict gestational age, e.g., in cases of hydrocephalus, anencephaly or short-limb dwarfism. Two other groups4,6 have also demonstrated that the measurement of the fetal foot by ultrasound provides a reliable estimate of gestational age.
Visualization of the foot is useful to find or exclude anomalies such as club foot6 and arthrogryposis. Fetal foot polydactyly has been seen in trisomy 13. Campbell et al17 found that the femur versus foot length ratio was approximately unity throughout 14 and 40 weeks of gestation. Our study demonstrates a statistically significant linear correlation between the fetal foot length and gestational age.
Acknowledgment
We are grateful to Clifford Qualles, MD, of the Clinical Research Center at the University of New Mexico, for the statistical analysis of the data.
Table 1: Nomogram of foot size against gestation
Age | 5th (mm) | 50th (mm) | 95th (mm) |
15 | 14 | 20 | 25 |
16 | 17 | 22 | 28 |
17 | 19 | 25 | 30 |
18 | 22 | 27 | 33 |
19 | 24 | 30 | 35 |
20 | 27 | 32 | 38 |
21 | 29 | 35 | 40 |
22 | 32 | 37 | 43 |
23 | 35 | 40 | 45 |
24 | 37 | 42 | 48 |
25 | 40 | 45 | 50 |
26 | 42 | 48 | 53 |
27 | 45 | 50 | 55 |
28 | 47 | 53 | 58 |
29 | 50 | 55 | 61 |
30 | 52 | 58 | 63 |
31 | 55 | 60 | 66 |
32 | 57 | 63 | 68 |
33 | 60 | 65 | 71 |
34 | 62 | 68 | 73 |
35 | 65 | 70 | 76 |
36 | 67 | 73 | 78 |
37 | 70 | 75 | 81 |
38 | 72 | 78 | 83 |
39 | 75 | 80 | 86 |
40 | 77 | 83 | 88 |
References
1.Chervenak F et al.: Antenatal Sonographic Diagnosis of Club Foot. J Ultrasound Med 4:49, 1985.
2.Mercer BM, Sklar S, Shariatmadar A, Gillieson MS and D"Alton ME: Fetal foot length as a predictor of gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 156:350-5, February, 1987.
3.Munsick RA: Similarities of Nero and Caucasian fetal extremity lengths in the interval from 9 - 20 weeks of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156:183-5, 1987.
4.Shalev E, Wener E, Zuckerman H, and Megory E: Reliability of sonographic measurement of the fetal foot. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. (JC:kbu) 8(5):259-62, May, 1989.
5.Campbell J, Henderson A, Campbell S: The fetal femur/foot length ratio: a new parameter to assess dysplastic limb reduction. Obstetrics & Gynecology. (JC:0c2) 72(2):181-4, August, 1988.
6.Streeter GL: Weight, sitting height, head size, foot length, and menstrual age for the human embryo. Contrib Embryol 11:143, 1920.
7. Chattergjee, HS , Adhate A: Ultrasonic imaging of fetal foot for evaluation of gestational age. Preceeding of the WFUMB, p. 206, July 14-19, 1986.