Case of the Week #520

Ho F (1); Cuillier F (2); Dospeux J (2); Abossolo T (2); Alessandri JL (3); Fernandez C (4)

(1) Radiologist, private sector, 97400 Saint-Denis, Reunion Island, France.
(2) Department of Obstetrics, Felix Guyon Hospital, Reunion Island, France.
(3) Department of Paediatrics, Felix Guyon Hospital, 97400 Saint-Denis, Reunion Island, France.
(4) Department of Pathology, Felix Guyon Hospital, 97400 Saint-Denis, Reunion Island, France.

Posting Dates:  June 25, 2020 - July 16, 2020

Case Report: A 40-year-old woman was referred to our hospital for multiple fetal anomalies. Down syndrome screening was normal. Her personal history was significant for uncontrolled diabetes mellitus which existed before the pregnancy. Our ultrasound examination between 28 to 32 weeks of gestation revealed the following anomalies.

US8
Fetal biometrics
US1
Image 1
Video 1
US3
Image 2
US4
Image 3
Video 2
Video 3
US6
Image 4
US7
Image 5

We also performed a fetal CT scan at 28 weeks of gestation to identify additional bone anomalies.

CT1
Image 6
CT2
Image 7
CT3
Image 8
CT4
Image 9
CT5
Image 10
CT6
Image 11
CT7
Image 12
CT8
Image 13
CT9
Image 14
CT10
Image 15

Additionally, a fetal MRI was performed at 32 weeks to evaluate for central nervous system and visceral abnormalities.

MR1
Image 16
MR2
Image 17
MR3
Image 18
MR4
Image 19
MR5
Image 20
MR6
Image 21
MR7
Image 22
MR8
Image 23
MR9
Image 24
MR10
Image 25
MR11
Image 26
MR12
Image 27
MR13
Image 28
MR14
Image 29
MR15
Image 30

View the Answer Hide the Answer

Answer

We present a case of caudal regression syndrome

The images showed the following findings:

  • Images 1-5 and videos 1-3: Ultrasound examination revealed a male fetus with normal estimated fetal weight and roughly normal biometry. There is a bilateral cleft involving both lip and palate, normal ear, a double inlet single ventricle (2 atrioventricular valves normally inserted associated with an extended ventricular septal defect, leading to a single ventricle). Both outflow tracts were malposed but not obstructed (not shown). Spinal examination was difficult and non-conclusive on ultrasound. Our differential diagnosis included CHARGE syndrome.
  • Images 6-15: CT scan at 28 weeks of pregnancy was performed to evaluate for additional bone anomalies such as inner ear semicircular canal agenesis. The fetal CT revealed usual appearance of semicircular canals, cochleae and choanae, as well as a wide hard palate defect involving the maxillary bone due to the bilateral cleft lip and palate. A vertebral block L3-L4 with complete agenesis of L5, sacrum, and coccyx was identified. Iliac wings and limbs structure were normal.
  • Images 16-30: We also performed a fetal brain MRI at 32 weeks to look for olfactory bulbs agenesis and potential additional brain anomalies. Olfactory bulbs were present and there was no chorio-retinal coloboma. There were no other significant abnormalities of the brain. CHARGE syndrome seemed unlikely. However, the sacral agenesis was highly suggestive of caudal regression syndrome, especially due to the patient’s history of diabetes mellitus. We then performed a visceral and spine MRI, at the same gestational age, which showed:
    1. Tethered cord at L4, no syringomyelia, no chiari malformation
    2. Sacral bony defect but also gluteal muscles agenesis
    3. Normally meconium-filled rectal pouch, ruling out high-type associated anorectal malformation
    4. Odd orientation of both kidneys, in V shape, suggesting horseshoe kidneys
    5. No associated presacral mass, which would have suggested a prenatal Currarino syndrome spectrum

Note that on both the CT at 28 weeks and the MRI at 32 weeks of pregnancy, the fetus’ lower limbs had the same orientation, in a “crossed legged tailor-like” fashion.

Repeat ultrasound examination (not shown) confirmed absence of lower limb movement. Our main prenatal diagnosis was then caudal regression syndrome, group 2 with tethered cord (as opposed to group 1 with blunt conus medullaris), associated with bilateral cleft lip and palate, and double-inlet single ventricle.

The patient chose to terminate the pregnancy.

Fetopathologic examination found a normal brain with normal choanae and ears, as well as normal lungs, diaphragm, thymus, esophagus, abdominal situs, liver, gallbladder, pancreas, and spleen. It confirmed the bilateral cleft lip and palate, double inlet single ventricle with malposed great arteries and levocardia, as well as the horseshoe kidneys, absence of anorectal malformation. Autopsy found an additional toe anomaly with both 2nd toes overlapping the 3rd toes bilaterally, which is a mild foot deformity. No anomaly found on histological examination of various organs, especially no sign of infectious CMV or parvovirus B19 infection.

Rx1
Image 31: postmortem X-rays confirmed the L5 and sacral agenesis.
Rx2
Image 32: postmortem X-rays confirmed the L5 and sacral agenesis.

Our final diagnosis thus was Caudal Regression syndrome, group 2 with tethered cord (as opposed to group 1 with blunt conus medullaris), associated with bilateral cleft lip and palate, and double-inlet single ventricle heart, horseshoe kidneys and mild foot deformities.

References

[1] Nievelstein RA, Valk J, Smit LM et al. MR of the caudal regression syndrome: embryologic implications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994 Jun;15(6):1021-9.
[2]  Rufener SL, Ibrahim M, Raybaud CA et al. Congenital spine and spinal cord malformations-pictorial review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194 (3): S26-37. 
[3] Stroustrup Smith A, Grable I, Levine D. Case 66: caudal regression syndrome in the fetus of a diabetic mother. Radiology. 2004;230 (1): 229 33.

Discussion Board

Join the discussion about this case
Add bookmark Bookmarked

Menu