Fig. 1: Large cystic lesions are present peripherally, corresponding to hydrocephaly due to central obstruction of the region of thalamus by a hyperechoic mass.
Large cystic regions were present peripherally, corresponding to hydrocephaly due to central obstruction. Color Doppler demonstrated few vessels. Other findings were unremarkable.
Due to the poor prognosis of the lesion, termination of pregnancy was performed. A stillborn male fetus weighing 2,040g was delivered. At autopsy, marked enlargement of the head was present and cranial sutures were widely splayed. On gross pathologic examination, the brain weighed 410g, the cerebral hemispheres were spread widely apart by a central heterogeneous mass measuring 8.5 x 5.0 x 5.0 cm. There were 30 cc of bloody serous subdural fluid present.
On formalin fixed brain, the cerebral hemispheres had been displaced laterally by a large midline mass. The cerebellum and midbrain had also been displaced anteriorly and inferiorly. The effect of the mass could be seen best in the ventricles, where there was massive hydrocephalus with severe cortical thinning. The size of the mass and its resulting distortion of the normal brain precluded accurate identification of the origin of this mass, but it appeared to be in the posterior midline.
Microscopic examination revealed a predominance of small, round, dark blue nucleus with scant cytoplasm. In addition, other immature cells were seen, including ependyma, lung, intestine, apocrine glands, cartilage, skin and striated muscles. No prominent calcification was seen. All of the cells in these different tissues appeared benign.
No site of origin was identified in this case due to the large size of the mass. However, the pineal gland was not identified grossly or microscopically and could be the site of origin in this case. All other organs were normal.
Discussion
Congenital brain tumors represent only 0.5-1.9% of all pediatric brain tumors5. Teratoma is the most common tumor in the neonatal period, representing one-third to one-half of all tumors5, 6.
Fetal intracranial tumors are rare, and their incidence is unknown3. The first reported prenatal case appeared in a review of fetal anomalies by Devore and Hobbins in 19791. Ten cases of intracranial teratoma have been reported in the literature1-4.
In a recent study of 45 neonatal brain tumors6, the diagnoses were 12 teratomas, 12 primitive neuroectodermal tumors (including 4 medulloblastomas), 9 astrocytomas, 4 glioblastomas multiforme (astrocytoma grade IV), 3 choroid plexus papillomas and one of each of ependymoma, medulloepithelioma, germinoma, angioblastic meningioma and ganglioglioma. Two-thirds of these tumors were supratentorial, which contrasts with the usual infratentorial location of infantile brain tumors.
Pathology
Teratomas are tumors derived from the three embryonic layers. They may contain well-differentiated structures (such as hair, bone, or muscle) or undifferentiated structures. In the latter case, they have a tendency toward malignancy. Teratomas usually occur in the pineal region (2/3), the suprasellar region, or the fourth ventricle10.
Intracranial teratomas are more common in males than females (M5-10:F1)10. The exceptional familial occurrence of pineal teratomas in two brothers has been reported11.
Diagnosis
The use of ultrasound to assess fetal intracranial structure allows differentiation between tumors, hydrocephalus and other abnormalities3. Experience in the prenatal diagnosis of brain neoplasm is limited. Cystic tumors and teratomas are usually characterized by complete loss of the normal intracranial architecture4. A brain tumor should be suspected when space-occupying lesions with cystic areas and/or solid areas are seen or when there is a change in shape or size of normal anatomic structures. Hydrocephalus is frequently associated with brain tumor and may be the presenting sign7.
The intrauterine diagnosis of intracranial teratoma by ultrasound is rare. Early and accurate diagnosis may be important, both in reducing maternal morbidity and in offering appropriate advise to parents with regard to prognosis.
Associated anomalies
Two of the neonatal cases of intracranial teratomas had associated congenital anomalies such as anencephaly and facial cleft13, and about half of prenatal cases had polyhydramnios2.
Differential diagnosis
The differential diagnosis in infants is relatively limited, usually including astrocytoma, teratoma and ependymoma. Other causes of cystic tumors include hematoma and cystic neoplasm8, 9. Another differential diagnosis includes pinealoblastoma and papillary ependymoma. There are, unfortunately, few distinguishing factors between these different types of tumors, and most present as a large heterogeneous and partially cystic mass with associated hydrocephalus.
Medulloepithelioma may be hypoechoic, while astrocytoma, lipoma and angioblastic meningioma are hyperechoic.
Teratomas are usually associated with calcifications. Our case presented with sonographic suggestion of calcifications, but this was not confirmed at pathology.
Intrauterine infections may also produce calcifications, although they are not typically associated with a mass or the distortion of the intracranial structures.
Table 1: Differential diagnosis of cystic teratoma6
Differential diagnosis
|
Differences
|
PNET (primitive neuroectodermal tumor), Glioblastoma multiforme, Choroid plexus papilloma, Medulloepithelioma, Germinoma, Angioblastic meningioma, Ganglioglioma
|
two-thirds of these tumors were in a supratentorial location, unfortunately few distinguishing factors exist in CT scan and MRI
|
Pinealoblastoma, Papillary ependymoma
|
large heterogeneous and partially cystic mass with associated hydrocephalus
|
Medulloepithelioma
|
hypoechoic mass
|
Astrocytoma, Lipoma, Angioblastic meningioma,
|
hyperechoic mass
|
Porencephaly
|
not associated with a mass or a distortion of anatomy, no calcification.
|
Prognosis
The prognosis of intracranial tumors depends on a number of factors, including the histologic type, size and location of the lesion. Prenatally diagnosed congenital intracranial teratomas are usually fatal7.
In a study of 25 perinatal teratomas12, 11 were stillborns (group 1), 5 delivered alive but were abnormal at birth (group 2), and 9 were normal at birth but became symptomatic within the first 3 months of life (group 3). The prognosis for the infants in the second group was uniformly fatal within 1 hour to 9 weeks. One of the infants of the third group survived. The first and second groups are most likely to be detected prenatally (mass plus hydrocephalus) and can probably best be used to assess the prognosis in fetuses. Should a small intracranial mass be detected prenatally, unassociated with hydrocephaly (thus likely to be equivalent to group 3), one could expect a small chance of survival (1 in 9), and the lesion should probably be monitored for its growth rate if it is considered in a position that would allow resection. This contrasts with the prognosis in older children and adults in which a rather good prognosis has been described10.
Management
Pregnancy termination can be offered to the parents before viability. The classic teratoma (with important distortion of the intracranial anatomy) should be conservatively managed, because it is associated with a very high death rate. Vaginal delivery is usually recommended. If the tumor is associated with macrocrania, a cephalocentesis to overcome fetopelvic disproportion should be considered7. Infants suspected of having an intracranial tumor should undergo CT or MRI scanning to better define the characteristics and extent of the tumors9.
References
1.DeVore G, Hobbins J. Diagnosis of structural abnormalities in the fetus. Clin Perinatol 1979;6:293.
2.Lipman SP, Pretorius DH, Rumack CM, Manco Johnson ML. Fetal intracranial teratoma: Ultrasound diagnosis of three cases and a review of the literature. Radiology 1985;157:491-494.
3.Hoff NR, Mackay IM. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of intracranial teratoma. JCU 1980;8:247-249
4.Kirkinen P, Surano I, Juppila P, et al. Combined use of ultrasound and computed tomography in the evaluation of fetal intracranial abnormality. J Perinat Med 1982;10:257.
5.Wakai S, Arai T, Nagai M. Congenital brain tumors. Surg Neurol 1984 ;21 :597-609.
6.Buetow PC, Smirniotopoulous JG, Done S. Congenital brain tumors: Review of 45 cases. AJR 1990;155:587-593.
7.Romero R, Pilu G, Jeanty J, et al. Prenatal Diagnosis of Congenital Anomalies. Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, Connecticut, 1988.
8.Sauerbrei EE, Cooperberg PL. Cystic tumors of the fetal and neonatal cerebrum: Ultrasound and computed tomographic evaluation. Radiology 1983;147:689.
9.Grant EG, Tessler F, Perrella R. Infant intracranial sonography. Radiol Clin North Am 1988; 26:1105.
10.Russell DS, Rubinstein LJ. Pathology of Tumors of the Nervous System, 5th ed. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1989.
11.Wakai S, Segawa H, Kitahara S, Asano T. Teratoma in pineal region in two brothers. J Neurosurg 1980;53:238.
12.Greenhouse AH,Neubuerger KT. Intracranial teratoma of newborn. Arch Neurol 1960;3:126-32.
13.Rueda-Pedraza ME, Heifetz SA, Sesterhenn IA, Clark GB. Primary intracranial germ cell tumors in the first two decades of life. Perspect Pediatr Pathol 1987;10:160.